"Nice try kid, but I think you just brought a knife. To a gunfight." --From Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
There have been several letters (example) sent to the Post questioning why the lack of public input into
placing secure firearm storage in the schools; some have objected to such placement. Perhaps
a public hearing for the purposes of educating the public and soliciting public input is a good idea. But this suggestion is based on extensive police tactical thinking that has grown out of past mass shootings.
The carnage of Columbine drastically changed police tactics
when responding to a school shooter. Traditional police tactics at the time of
Columbine involved first responding officers securing a perimeter and waiting
for a SWAT team to arrive. But Columbine was not a traditional hostage situation but a mass shooting; this tactic simply gave the shooters more
time to kill people. Presently, many police forces stress that first responding
officers actively engage and eliminate the threat as soon as possible in order to save
lives.
This, of course, puts the first responders at tremendous
risk. A 2014 study, “The Police Response to Active Shooter Incidents”, put
together by the Police Executive Research Forum indicates that when a solo
officer enters an active shooting situation while the shooter is still firing, in
three quarters of the situations the officer directly engages the shooter and
in one third of those situations the first responding officer is shot.
In the case of Columbine, the first officer on the scene, a school resource officer, attempted to engage Harris and Kleibold with a sidearm (note that our SRO's have sidearms, so there are already police carrying guns in the schools) while they responded with rifle fire. This is not surprising; the 2014 study indicates that roughly a quarter of shooters have rifles (think Newtown, Dallas, TX and Orlando, FL) and some have multiple weapons (Virginia Tech). If a responding officer cannot rapidly and safely obtain adequate firepower, the officer and trapped victims are at even greater risk. One police training guide written for a large police organization specifically calls out that first responding officers to an active shooter situation should, at a minimum, be equipped with a rifle (AR-15, Mini-14, etc.) or shotgun with slug rounds.
In the case of Columbine, the first officer on the scene, a school resource officer, attempted to engage Harris and Kleibold with a sidearm (note that our SRO's have sidearms, so there are already police carrying guns in the schools) while they responded with rifle fire. This is not surprising; the 2014 study indicates that roughly a quarter of shooters have rifles (think Newtown, Dallas, TX and Orlando, FL) and some have multiple weapons (Virginia Tech). If a responding officer cannot rapidly and safely obtain adequate firepower, the officer and trapped victims are at even greater risk. One police training guide written for a large police organization specifically calls out that first responding officers to an active shooter situation should, at a minimum, be equipped with a rifle (AR-15, Mini-14, etc.) or shotgun with slug rounds.
As far as likelihood? While school shootings are still rare, they are becoming more frequent and occur where you would not expect them: Newtown and Columbine are examples. That Los Alamos resembles Lake Wobegon does not immunize us. Indeed, it has not been that long since a local
youth went on a burglary rampage and was in possession of multiple assault
style rifles and handguns (for those who worry about guns being stolen from a
school safe, there are obviously much softer targets around). He was later
arrested when he violated his release conditions and entered school grounds. Thankfully, he did
not do so for homicidal purposes.
Stolen guns found by police in a
local youth's bedroom.
Daily Post photo, with permission |
While a school shooting is unlikely, it is not out of the
question; this attempt by police to securely cache weapons has been proposed so first responders can be prepared for a worst case scenario. But having tactical weapons is
the last line of defense here. While school personnel and police must train and
be familiar with how to respond to specific active shooter situations, the real work is in avoiding them. We in this community must understand these events and dedicate the emotional and mental health resources needed to
ensure that none of us, and none of our children, ever take on the distorted
point of view of an active shooter.
Let’s make sure these weapons are truly secure and
responders properly trained in emergency response. But let's not get too myopic and only think about the pros and cons of gun safes. There are a lot of
other considerations we need to address in order to ensure those safes merely collect dust.
No comments:
Post a Comment